Posts Tagged ‘Cheney’

Dick “Danger” Cheney

Published: July 14th, 2008

This actually explains a lot about Dick Cheney and the administration’s response to 9/11. Seems like he lives in a state of constant, pathological fear:

In the days after 9/11, when fears of another terrorist strike were at their peak, Vice President Dick Cheney was convinced that he had been subjected to a lethal dose of anthrax, according to a new book.

White House insiders from that white-knuckle time told author Jane Mayer, who authored “The Dark Side, The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals,” that the scare contributed to Cheney’s insistence on hard-line tactics for fighting terror.

Mayer, a writer for the New Yorker, claims that the vice president became the driving force in pushing for tougher interrogation tactics that critics charge went over the legal line and constitute torture.

In the days after the horror of 9/11, the country seemed to be under assault from many sides, with anthrax letters showing up in Congress and newsrooms.

On Oct. 18, 2001, a White House alarm went off indicating that sensors had detected dangerous levels of radioactive, chemical or biological agents. According to Mayer, anyone who had entered the White House situation room, including Cheney, had been exposed.

“They thought Cheney was already lethally infected,” said a former administration officer who had kept the White House secret until now, according to the book.[. . .]

Miraculously, he survived.

But in the days after the incident, Cheney was taking no chances. Eleven days later, Cheney insisted on leaving the White House and retreating to one of his “secure, undisclosed locations,” the book claims.

Cheney and other Cabinet members took turns hunkering down in one of several cold war era bunkers built to survive a nuclear attack. The bunkers, deep underground, were crammed with communications gear and Cheney would stay in what was dubbed the “The Commander in Chief’s Suite,” Mayer writes.

When vice president wasn’t in the bunker, Mayer claims that “a sense of constant danger followed Cheney everywhere.” The route was altered daily during the veep’s commute to his above-ground office. On the back seat next to him would be a duffel bag stuffed with a gas mask and biochemical survival suit. And a doctor nearly always traveled with him, “The Dark Side” claims.

Of course, Cheney and Rumsfeld share a deep history of delusion, paranoid ideation, persecution complexes, and a variety of unreasonable fears.

Update:

Andrew Sullivan is out today with a chilling piece on Cheney: “Vice President For Torture.”

Moby Dick

Published: April 27th, 2008

Apparently, Vice President Cheney has time to take out of his busy schedule to ensure the extinction of rare whales:

WaPo

White House officials for more than a year have blocked a rule aimed at protecting endangered North Atlantic right whales by challenging the findings of government scientists, according to documents obtained by the Union of Concerned Scientists.

The documents, which were mailed to the environmental group by an unidentified National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration official, illuminate a struggle that has raged between the White House and NOAA for more than a year. In February 2007, NOAA issued a final rule aimed at slowing ships traversing some East Coast waters to 10 knots or less during parts of the year to protect the right whales, but the White House has blocked the rule from taking effect.

North Atlantic right whales, whose surviving population numbers fewer than 400, are one of the most endangered species on Earth, and scientists have warned that the loss of just one more pregnant female could doom the species. Some shipping companies have opposed the NOAA proposal, saying slowing their vessels will cost the industry money.

The documents, which House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) released yesterday, show that the White House Council of Economic Advisers and Vice President Cheney’s office repeatedly questioned whether the rule was needed. Waxman, who sent a letter to the White House asking for an explanation, said the exchange “appears to be the latest instance of the White House ignoring scientists and other experts.”

In one document, the Council of Economic Advisers questioned “the reliability of analysis in the published literature on which NOAA is basing its position.” The council conducted its own analysis and concluded that “the relationship between [vessel] speed and [whale] injury . . . may not be as strong of a relationship as is suggested in published papers.”

Yes, it stands to reason. There is no “strong relationship” between acceleration and force upon impact. The War on Empiricism™ continues.

Recent Entries

Recent Comments

Network

Our Shop