Thank God someone finally said it:
The media’s reporting of Tim Russert’s death has been so over the top it’s embarrassing. The above link does a nice job of undressing the media on this point but I’ll go a step further. I will attack a dead man.
I can’t say that I’ve watched a lot of “Meet the Press” so it may be unfair for me to critique Russert. However it’s also important to note that a big reason I haven’t watched a lot of “Meet the Press” is that I never really liked Russert. I saw something in his big puppy dog eyes and sloppy posture that read desperate to me. Like a tough guy who actually was nothing more than a thumb sucking sycophant.
That’s a lot to read into the way a guy looks into a camera from behind a fake desk, I know. But it wasn’t just his look. It was the things he’d say. How many interviews did I see with this guy talking about being from Buffalo and being the son of Russ? I saw “Meet the Press” one time where at the end he looked into the camera and talked about how much he loved being “Luke’s Dad.” I can’t remember if it was the kid’s birthday or a past Father’s Day or what - it may very well have been apropos of nothing. I just remember a sensation tingling up my spine - a douche chill. It also enraged me. I don’t have enough space in my head for valuable information, but I can’t erase from my hard drive that this windbag has a son named Luke. God Dammit.
On an episode of “Bill Moyers Journal” titled, “Buying the War” Moyers asks Tim Russert about the Bush administration’s use of “Meet the Press” to sell the upcoming war in Iraq. The exchange is priceless for so many reasons. Allow me to paraphrase: When Russert was asked why he simply took the administration’s word for things instead of checking to see if what they were saying was true or made sense, Russert responded,
“Hey look, I’m a guy from Buffalo. I work my sources hard…”
Seriously. He responded that he was from Buffalo.
The implication then and every time he brought up that he was from Buffalo was that he was a strong, hard worker who didn’t take guff from anybody. But as this exchange reveals so vividly, people who actually are that way don’t need to say it, and those that aren’t often rely on this background as a way of overcompensating for something a tad less noble.
That brings up the other thing I know about Russert that no one seems to be memorializing. His work as an author. If James Fry were to die tomorrow I’m guessing that within the first one and a half sentences of his obituary there’d be some hint to the fraud he perpetrated by calling, “A Million Little Pieces” a non-fiction memoir. Why then has no one brought up that this “journalist of our generation” took sole credit for writing a book that was actually written by a ghostwriter? Not only was the ghostwriter not credited on the cover, the book is about Russert’s relationship with his father. Shouldn’t this brilliant journalist be able to write his own book when the subject is his relationship with his Father - the man who made him so noble and tough to begin with?
But what about Russert’s work on “Meet the Press”… and the Today Show, and MSNBC, and the Nightly News? (How hard can a man “work his sources” when he’s on TV every minute anyway?)
Frankly I was never that impressed with Russert’s brand of gotcha journalism. So a guy says one thing and then Russert rolls out video (provided by the work of a production assistant paid five hundred dollars a week to watch C-Span) of him saying something else? Big deal. As the Moyers interview points out, there’s a lot more to journalism than simply what an interviewee says, whether they said it recently or long ago. Furthermore it reduces a subject to what its proponent (or opponent) says about it.
If, for example, a journalist interviews a politician about tax hikes and that politician says there should be a tax hike but we see a clip of him years ago saying there shouldn’t be a tax hike, what have we learned about the real issue of whether it’s a good idea to raise taxes? The interviewee becomes the subject and not tax hikes, or the war in Iraq, or global warming, etc.
As the first link in this story points out, the memorializing of Russert is more about the media then about Russert. They liked the guy. Fair enough. They have tons of footage of him that they can now rerun and plenty of outlets they need to fill time on anyway. True dat. But for a guy who was quick to bring his own personal life history into a realm it shouldn’t be to begin with, I think even he may blush at this overkill.
When I heard Tim Russert died I was sad the way a person is usually sad to hear of the passing of someone familiar. Now I just want this coverage to die.